It's a bit hard to suggest more complex yet interesting features without them being shot down due to them being "too complex" or the underlying systems "delicate and with a lot of moving parts".
The quirks of how project and object files make it hard (but not impossible) to use in larger teams.ĭespite regional pricing, the monthly or annual subscription plans can be expensive for students or hobbyists, and the free version is limited. The HTML5 focus makes it easy to share your projects with others via features like remote preview or simply through the fast export process. With the addition of javascript scripting, it's very easy to mix block based logic and actual code in a project, and you can implement external javascript libraries to extend your project. The community on Discord is very helpful, and frequently share example templates and addons/effects that extend Construct's functionality. It is in active development, and frequently receives updates with bug fixes, new features, and suggestions from the community.
#GAMEMAKER STUDIO 2 VS CONSTRUCT 3 HOW TO#
I've taught game development to high school students using C3, and they have no problems learning how to use the software. When developing my own games, I can quickly add new levels and features without much fuss.
I'm currently using the software to develop a larger commercial game, and the experience has proved to be smooth as the sole programmer during these first couple of months of development.Ĭonstruct 3 is clean and simple to use. Kommentare: I've used Construct 3 to develop short and sweet web games, and the process has proved fast, easy and efficient.
0 kommentar(er)
